Calabi-Yau Manifold ENGLISH

Picuture Statement

nrademacher — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:01:44 +0000

Like everbody in my blog community I joined the show and made my own collage. The explanation of every picture you can see bellow:

Questions:

First name?
Favourite meal?
Which school did you attend?
Favourite color?
Celebrity Crush?
Favourite baverage?
Dreaming of vecations in …
Favourite dessert?
What do you want to be when you’ll be grown up?
What do you like most in/of life?
One word which describes you?
your flickr-name.

Answers:

1. Nicolei, 2. chocolate, 3. business school, 4. red, 5. Scarlett Johanson, 6. Coke, 7. Patagonia, 8. Creme Caramel, 9. Le Chef, 10. Beauté, 11. self-confident, 12. No Name

Problems with the omnipotent evil

nrademacher — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:52:45 +0000

Is [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
- Epicurus, 341 – 270 BCE

Diplomats from Hamburg

nrademacher — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:45:31 +0000

Enjoying electronic music is like the bit in your computer. Either you like or not – one or zero. For me as a real fan of electronic music I’m doing hard to convince none-electronic listeners to give it a try. You can always hear complaints like ‘I cannot dance on electro’ and so on.

But out of the blue there popped up two DJs who will change this clash – Digitalism. These two guys from Hamburg composed a facinating album which combines the fine electronic tunes in Daft Punk style with melodic house components. Idealism is one of the best electionic albums of the last month and I really recommend it.

Apes and Pyramides

nrademacher — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:17:34 +0000

I recently finished a nice book called ‘The Third Chimpanzee’ written by Jared Diamond. There is hardly a book I have ever read which such a variety of interesting themes. I knew Jared Diamond from a book – Collapse – I have read in my last Christmas holidays and back then I was very happy with that book, too.

Collapse is a very extended argumentation that all civilizations in history which collapsed had a similar pattern for their breakdown. Diamond is talking about the famous people of the Easter Islands (Rapanui) and about the Anazazi (natives of Northern America). I wisely chose the words ‘very extended’ for this book because it has 400 pages and sometimes it was hard to read everything without becoming bored. Nevertheless, after this book my general education had grown and now I understand social and cultural interdependencies on this planet a little bit better.

The main theme of the book ‘The Third Cimpanzee’ is supported by ‘Collapse’. First of all Dimond gives a good overview of how humans became like they are and what herritage we all have in our genes. He gives some good reasons why we could be called a ‘third chimpanzee’. After the first half of the book the theme is shrinking to the consequences of human culture and economy on this planet and where it leads to. It is hard to explain all the intersting facts and arguments in a short post but to give a little taste of some of them here some questions aswered inside the book:

Why do humans have such a complex emotional and social sturcture, including love?
Should we give chimpanzees human rights?
Why was the past not a ‘Golden Age’ (contrary to Rousseau)?
Why, based on our experiece, we will never meet alien life?
Why there are human races and why it is an absolute nonsense to make a difference between races?
Is it a sheer accident that the western world dominates the globe?
etc.

Salty Air

nrademacher — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:06:05 +0000

Sylt is always worthy a journey. Sylt is one of the most famous islands of Germany. It lays in the Northern Sea near the Danish border. You can find it easily because it has a very special form like a bow.

Recently I had my first visit on Sylt and it was a great experience. I was lucky because the weather was really nice and I really could enjoy the island. On Sylt you have this very special German conservative atmosphere, but that doesn’t bother because the people are nice and the landscape is just beautiful.

To be honest, I should have been the youngest human on the island but Sylt is quite expensive and not easy to reach. But an exclusive destination and high costs are also a grantor of quality. This quality you can get when you go out to eat on Sylt. One evening my colleagues and I have been to the Sansibar – a very nice high-quality restaurant with mainly fish on the menu. And they have an exquisite wine carte. So whenever you will be on Sylt visit the Sansibar – or other very nice restaurants on the beach-site.

Snail à la carte

nrademacher — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:15:35 +0000

Actually, I am not a coward concerning food. I ate a lot of different seafood and other animal and I have to admit that I really love to eat seafood and are sometimes very curious about new tastes. But regarding snails I have been very picky in the past. OK, I tried frogs and other stuff in France but I have never tried snails.

At my visit in Oberhausen , Germany, last week it was my turn to give it a try. I was still a little bit skeptic when I read ‘snails’ in the card of the restaurant so I decided to order ‘Snails in Tomato-Sauce’. In case of a bad taste of the snails I would had some tomato sauce. Afterward I really have to say that snails are really tasty although they are slimy. They taste a little bit like mussels. So when you like mussels you will like snails as well. And I learned that you should really give it a try before you give a statement about a matter.

What is evolution?

nrademacher — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:26:32 +0000

Some questions are very essential to ask. One of these questions is what evolution really is and which facts support it. My curiosity led me to the book ‘What Evolution Is’ written by Ernst Mayr. I had looked for a book which is know for its neutral viewpoint and this book by Ernst Mayr is really fitting in that respect. By the way, Ernst Mayr could have been one of the most influential biologists of the last century. Unfortunately, he died some month ago.

The foreword states to be written for the following three groups:

biologist who want to be up-to-date to the actual achievements
people who think that evolutions built the earth we know today but are not really sure about proving facts
creationists who want to know the argumentation of evolutionist to have starting points helping them to attack them

Especially point three demonstrates the openness of the author. The argumentation line is very conclusive and free of prejudice or propaganda for the evolution. On the other hand it is very good to read and it makes it easy to comprehend it with the real life. Read it!

Finally, I want to quote the author:

Evolution as such is no longer a theory for a modern author. It is as much a fact as that the earth revolves around the sun.

Down Under – Part Three

nrademacher — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:12:37 +0000

After the death of the dinosaurs there was a new era to begin – the Cenozoic which is still ongoing in the present. Those eras are not as far away and there were some foundations set for our present life on earth. Again, enjoy it …

Walking with Prehistoric Beast – Intro

Walking with Prehistoric Beast 1 (Part 1/3) – Eocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 1 (Part 2/3) – Eocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 1 (Part 3/3) – Eocene

Walking with Prehistoric Beast 2 (Part 1/3) – Late Eocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 2 (Part 2/3) – Late Eocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 2 (Part 3/3) – Late Eocene

Walking with Prehistoric Beast 3 (Part 1/3) – Oligocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 3 (Part 2/3) – Oligocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 3 (Part 3/3) – Oligocene

Walking with Prehistoric Beast 4 (Part 1/3) – Piacenzian
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 4 (Part 2/3) – Piacenzian
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 4 (Part 3/3) – Piacenzian

Walking with Prehistoric Beast 5 (Part 1/3) – Early Pleistocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 5 (Part 2/3) – Early Pleistocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 5 (Part 3/3) – Early Pleistocene

Walking with Prehistoric Beast 6 (Part 1/3) – Holocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 6 (Part 2/3) – Holocene
Walking with Prehistoric Beast 6 (Part 3/3) – Holocene

By the way, the Holocene is also know as the persent.

Down Under – Part Two

nrademacher — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:28:11 +0000

I hope you enjoyed the journey back into the days before the dinosarus. Now I want to give you the links for a new era in biodiversity: the Mesozoic. Enjoy the show!

Walking with Dinosaurs – Intro

Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 1 (1/3) - Late Triassic
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 1 (2/3) - Late Triassic
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 1 (3/3) - Late Triassic

Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 2 (1/3) - Late Jurrasic
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 2 (2/3) - Late Jurrasic
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 2 (3/3) - Late Jurrasic

Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 3 (1/3) - Late Triassic/Sea
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 3 (2/3) - Late Triassic/Sea
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 3 (3/3) - Late Triassic/Sea

Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 4 (1/3) - Early Cretaceous
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 4 (2/3) - Early Cretaceous
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 4 (3/3) – Early Cretaceous

Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 5 (1/3) - Albian (Early Cretaceous)
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 5 (2/3) - Albian (Early Cretaceous)
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 5 (3/3) - Albian (Early Cretaceous)

Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 6 (1/3) - Maastrichan (Late Cretaceous)
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 6 (2/3) - Maastrichan (Late Cretaceous)
Walking with Dinosaurs – Episode 6 (3/3) – Maastrichan (Late Cretaceous)

Feathered Dinosaurs

nrademacher — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:34:11 +0000

Maybe you’ve realized that there are more and more pictures or movies where you can see dinosaurs covered with small feathers. Why did those artist do that? Are there profound fossils or other data which support that idea?

There are fossils which show feathers on dinosaurs. The earliest are dated at the Early Cretaceous (some 124 million years ago). It is important to add at this point that we cannot expect too much fossil founds with feathers in the future because there had to be a number of lucky circumstances in the past came together to preserve feather structures. Those circumstance must have been, for example, hot vulcano ashes. A blog fellow made this picutre at a Natural History Museum in Vienna:

He stated that it looks quite trashy and that the artists used feathers of emus or ostriches to cover the dinosaur. But these artist are not as wrong as it looked on the first sight. Ostriches, for example, have no feathers for flying as dinosarus had have, too. Today, scientists do not really know which type of feathers or fibres dinosaurs had. This demands further investigations. Meanwhile some are pretty sure that the fossils shows down-feathers which are similar to birds. Wiki states:

Despite doubts the fossil feathers have roughly the same appearance as those of birds fossilized in the same locality, so there is no serious reason to think they are of different nature; moreover, no non-theropod fossil from the same site shows such an artifact, but sometimes show unambiguous hair (some mammals) or scales (some reptiles).
— ‘Feathered Dinosarus, Fossil evidence’ / Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A big questions is the advantage of therapoda to have feathers. One is temperature isolation which helps mainly younger or smaller dinosaurs to regulate their heat in a desert environment. An other very plausible explanation is courtship. But now I want to show you how those ‘feathers’ look on a fossil. Therer are nice pictures on the website of the ‘American Museum of Natural History’. When you look on the detailed picutre it is not very hard to realize the feather strucutres. More data you can find on http://research.amnh.org/vertpaleo/dinobird.html

This example is only one of many but there aren’t enough fossils to determine which dinsaurs had feathers and which not. But it is possible to determine it without profound fossil documentation. Paleontologist use in such cases the cladistic analysis. They build ‘cladistic trees’ or ‘cladograms’ to order all life forms. An analysis on feathered dinosaurs allows to state that even the gigantic Tyrannosaurs had feathers but only in ‘an early stage after hatching’. Wiki states concerning this issue:

In particular, the smaller theropod species may all have had feathers and possibly even the larger theropods (for instance T. rex) may have had feathers, in their early stages of development after hatching. Whereas these smaller animals may have benefitted from the insulation of feathers, large adult theropods are unlikely to have had feathers, since inertial heat retention would likely be sufficient to manage heat. Retention of internal heat may even have become a problem, had these very large creatures been feathered.

Fossil feather impressions are extremely rare; therefore only a few feathered dinosaurs have been identified so far. However, through a process called phylogenetic bracketing, scientists can infer the presence of feathers on poorly-preserved specimens. All fossil feather specimens have been found to show certain similarities. Due to these similarities and through developmental research almost all scientists agree that feathers could only have evolved once in dinosaurs. Feathers would then have been passed down to all later, more derived species (although it is possible that some lineages lost feathers secondarily).
— Feathered Dinosaurs, Taxonomy and the inference of feathers in other dinosaurs / Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When you want to read more of this stuff check out the ‘Journal of Dinosaur Paleontology’.